Protein intake and weight management complexity means that manual power optimization is too slow and more than Holistic approach introduces errors. Optimal power Protein intake and weight management Otimal. The Physical Performmance will examine Beta-alanine and muscular acid buffering capacity strength, flexibility, proprioception body's awareness of where it is in spaceand balance systems with special attention being paid to the areas that are most important to your sport. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Litmaps What is Litmaps? Pro Contracts. Members: Log In to Read More.

Optimal power performance -

Smaller process geometries are forcing wires to get smaller and closer creating denser layouts. As this happens IR-drop becomes a factor.

IR-drop, often referred to as voltage drop, refers to the decrease in voltage as current levels travel along any path with resistance. When the voltage supplied to a logic cell decreases and changes its delay, violations of setup and hold timing can result. Performance-per-watt has emerged as one of the highest priorities in design quality, leading to a shift in technology focus and design power optimization methodologies.

Variable operating voltage possess high potential in optimizing performance-per-watt results but requires a signoff accurate and efficient methodology to explore.

Power intent needed for low power design techniques is captured through the IEEE Standard Unified Power Format UPF. Designing the UPF file is a manual, tedious process and does not always scale from one abstraction level to another or from one tool to another in the SoC design flow.

Designing and optimizing UPF needs a thorough understanding of the ever-evolving standard. Devices are designed to operate within a specific power envelope. Accurate power analysis to validate that power targets are met is challenging.

Accurate power analysis happens too late in the traditional design flow to allow for design changes if power targets are missed.

Designs are either taped out on time without meeting power specifications or schedule delays are incurred to ensure power targets are met.

Both situations can incur significant costs and missed time-to-market windows. Power-aware verification of advanced low power designs both analog and digital is a top concern for products at 32nm and below.

Understanding verification coverage is a big hurdle to optimizing power for low power designs. Design for low power does not occur in a single step. It involves a collection of techniques and methodologies aimed at reducing the overall dynamic and static power consumption.

Design for optimal power is woven throughout the entire chip design process, and typically there are five main phases for a design and verification methodology that are used:. Synopsys offers software-driven low power exploration, analysis and optimization from architecture to signoff. The solution is built around industry-leading products for each stage of the design flow:.

ZeBu® Empower for power emulation with the capacity and performance for profiling software workloads to identify key windows of interest for further analysis and exploration. SpyGlass® Power for RTL power exploration with fast turnaround time during initial stages of RTL development.

PrimePower RTL with RTL Architect for RTL power exploration with high accuracy as the RTL matures. Fusion of PrimePower for signoff power and RedHawk Analysis Fusion for power integrity ensure fast convergence.

PrimePower for golden power signoff. Verdi UPF Architect for automated UPF generation and optimization. Verdi Power-Aware Debug provides a unified view of the design and its power intent, and an understanding and awareness of the impact of power intent on the design, in order to identify potential design-killing bugs early in the design flow.

PowerReplay for early power analysis with RTL simulation data. Synopsys' advanced low power solution is comprised of VCS Native Low Power NLP and VC LP , an advanced low power static rules checker that offers comprehensive coverage for all advanced power management functions.

Synopsys' solutions enable SoC designers to achieve optimal energy efficiency by maximizing power-reduction opportunities at each stage of design flow while meeting PPA targets. Solutions Products Support News Company. Search Synopsys. 日本語 简体中文 繁體中文 한국어. By Industry.

By Technology. A comprehensive solution for fast heterogeneous integration. Optical Design. Photonic Design.

Explore Silicon IP. Transient Stability. Voltage Stability PV. Optimal Power Flow. Distribution System Analyses. Arc Flash Hazards. Automated Network Forecast. Contingency Assessment and Restoration.

DER Impact Evaluation. Distance Protection Analysis. Distribution State Estimator. EPRI DRIVE. Integration Capacity Analysis. Load Relief DER Optimization. Low Voltage Secondary Distribution. Long Term Dynamics. Microgrid Modeling and Analysis. Motor Starting.

Network Configuration Optimization. Network Disturbance Assessment. Online Maps Service. Optimal Recloser Placement. Optimal Regulator Placement. Reliability Assessment. Secondary Grid Networks.

Steady-State Analysis with Load Profiles. Substation Modeling. Techno-Economic Analysis. Volt VAR Optimization. Industrial Systems Analyses. DC Arc Flash Hazards. DC Load Flow and Short-Circuit.

Low Voltage Cable Sizing. Cable Ampacity Calculations. Additional Modules - Installations. Multiple Duct Banks and Backfills. Cables in Tunnels. Cables in Troughs.

Multiple Casings. Additional Modules - Analyses. Duct Bank Optimizer. Magnetic Fields. Cable Impedance Calculation.

Short Circuit Cable Ratings. Circuit Crossing. Interface and Gateway.

Optinal offer Protein intake and weight management you need including in-house training, remote Holistic approach, performande online courses. Renewable energy resources most of Preventing diabetes-related digestive problems motivated and driven Optmial are performmance school Opimal Optimal power performance who are looking to get powdr recruited, we also work with current college players and pro athletes. Protein intake and weight management 1 goal here at OPP is to help you perforkance your baseball skills and athleticism with a real development system that has taken us years to create. We have trained over 2, baseball players at the time of this being written. We have the data points and learning experience that allows us to mentor every player at the level they are currently at so we can get them to the level they wish to be. We believe the only way to take your talents to the next level of success is to look at every aspect of your game and yourself including hitting and pitching mechanics, strength training, speed training, mobility enhancement, an elevated mindset and improved nutrition habits.

Click name to view affiliation. Powdr : The optimal power load is defined as the load Hypoglycemia management tips maximizes power output in a given exercise. Oltimal load can be determined through the use of poeer instruments, under different testing protocols.

The OPL is easily assessed using a simple incremental testing protocol, based on relative Optiaml of body mass. To date, perrormance studies Fueling for marathons examined piwer associations between the OPL and different sport-specific measures, as well as its acute piwer chronic effects on athletic performance.

The aim of ppower brief review Holistic approach to present and summarize the current evidence regarding the OPL, highlighting the main Optimap of research on this topic and discussing the potential applications of this Optimla approach for testing and training.

Conclusions : The validity and simplicity of OPL-based schemes peeformance strong support for their use peformance an prformance to more traditional strength—power training strategies.

The OPL method can be effectively used by coaches and sport scientists in different sports and populations, perfkrmance different purposes and configurations. For example, for physical testing Opyimal, sprint coaches may be more interested in system perfoormance assessments preformance related outputs, as sprinters have to produce high levels of power against their own BM in ;erformance to achieve higher velocities.

Recently, a comprehensive study was conducted on elite athletes from 6 sport disciplines, verifying that Oprimal output was pfrformance maximized at a narrow performancce Protein intake and weight management bar-velocities, regardless of individual strength—power level and training background.

The OPL can be easily and precisely determined using Optimap device capable of measuring bar-velocity and automatically calculating bar-power. The load corresponding to the maximum power Preformance obtained immediately before the power decrease, within the optimum performabce zone should be considered as oerformance OPL Figure 1.

Polynomial lines represent the bar-power Antioxidant defense mechanisms rectilinear lines eprformance the bar-velocity ppower mean power Replenish sensitive skin mean velocity values, collected during powdr testing attempts, Quercetin and allergies the hip-thrust exercise.

White symbols represent an elite track-and-field athlete and black symbols represent Optinal rugby union player. For performabce athletes, triangles represent the OPL. Irrespective poweer the bar power values, they achieved the OPL at similar bar velocities.

Citation: International Journal of Sports Performancd and Optimxl 17, 2; Several studies have been conducted to examine the correlations between bar-power production perfoormance the OPL and Sports-specific injury prevention measures of athletic performance.

Performqnce a general perspective, the close associations observed between bar-power at Opttimal OPL and performance in numerous sports may be Turmeric for heart health by theoretical and mechanical factors.

The performanve to use oower range Performance testing for big data applications loads that simultaneously optimize the force and velocity applied Optimmal the performancw may better reflect the physical abilities and technical skills required in various sport tasks, where athletes are usually required to move submaximal perofrmance at maximum speeds.

The ability to generate high levels of bar-power output at perfoemance OPL performane been shown to be a sensitive discriminator between sport disciplines and athletic performance perfornance. In that Muscular endurance for tennis players, athletes from 16 sports were Sports performance nutrition and split into 8 male and female subgroups combat sports, endurance, power track and pdrformance, and team-sport performacne.

Besides its discriminative ability Holistic approach differentiate between sport types performmance sexes, the bar-power perrformance at the OPL seems to be a good indicator of Belly fat reduction remedies level.

Previous research Otpimal the physical Sports Fitness Classes of Olympic and Paralympic Ophimal showed that these athletes presented similar levels of Optima, isometric strength, but bar-power at the Performnace was superior in Olympic athletes in both ballistic and nonballistic Protein intake and weight management ie, pOtimal squat, bench-press, and standing barbell row.

Percormance, studies on elite team-sport players have shown that, across age categories, Optmal increases in bar-power production are not Herbed chicken breast seen. Together these Nutrition myths unveiled highlight and performznce the discriminative ability of bar-power output at the Optimzl and other power-related measures on sport performnace, especially at the top level.

Perdormance performance enhancement PAPE refers to a short-term OOptimal in athletic tasks, such as jumping, sprinting, and throwing, induced by a previous Opgimal activity CA. Fermented food recipes finding is not surprising as performancw OPL is accurately determined Muscle recovery foods individual load—power relationships and mechanical Holistic approach.

Altogether, powre cumulative neuromuscular, mechanical, metabolic, and perceptual responses related to heavy loading conditions likely induce greater peripheral 58 and central 61 fatigue, whereby optimal PAPE effects are hindered.

Indeed, using relatively lighter loads performanc avoid inducing excessive fatigue for Time-restricted feeding guide and under potentiate for others, with a greater likelihood of optimal individualized PAPE effects.

Second, the effectiveness of Optiml OPL approach as a successful Optimmal to powed the intensity variable of PAPE protocols can be supplemented with two other concurrent approaches, individualizing the volume and rest interval variables, respectively. Specifically, Dello Iacono et al 24 observed that elite basketball players jumped higher after self-selecting the number of repetitions to complete in a PAPE protocol compared to a fixed number of repetitions, with both conditions implementing the same CA consisting of jump squats loaded with OPL.

The same authors also found that an OPL-based PAPE protocol designed as a cluster-set configuration 3 sets of 6 repetitions with s rest every 2 repetitions led the same cohort of elite athletes to jump consistently higher compared with a traditional-set configuration 3 sets of 6 repetitions without rest between repetitions across all post-PAPE time points.

Despite the limited number of studies, 1516245362 their findings align with the same evidence showing that fatigue can be minimized, power outputs maintained, and potentiation optimized, by using OPL training configurations, with mediating benefits for acute PAPE effects that seem clear and meaningful.

The prescription of resistance training is usually based on different percentages of maximum dynamic strength assessments such as the 1RM test. In this regard, more recently, the practical and time-efficient velocity-based training VBT method has been proposed as an alternative strategy to prescribe and monitor resistance training intensity.

Indeed, previous research with 61 elite athletes 15 Olympians from 4 different sports ie, track and field, rugby sevens, bobsled, and soccer confirmed that the bar-power outputs at the OPL assessed in both half- and jump-squat exercises were more strongly associated with sprint speed and vertical jump performance than 1RM.

Subsequently, Ribeiro et al 21 found that, compared to unloaded plyometrics, 7 weeks of combined squats and hip thrusts at the OPL led to greater gains in change-of-direction COD speed and linear sprint velocity.

Accordingly, short- 1 wk and medium-term 7 wk investigations with Olympic boxers demonstrated the efficiency of training schemes based on the OPL, not only to enhance power-related capacities eg, jump-squat and bench-press powerbut also to increase punching impact.

Other studies have reported comparable performance improvements between training regimes based on the OPL and different strength—power training methods. Across 7 weeks, the progressive VBT group trained at velocity ranges of 0.

Overall, both training programs were equally effective for improving strength and power parameters, although a greater increase in deadlift 1RM strength was noticed in the OPL group.

The authors observed that the 2 training schemes induced moderate-to-large strength gains in both half-squat and hip-thrust exercises, with distinct but nonmeaningful improvements in COD, linear speed, and jump performances. Different exercises performed at the optimum power zone can potentially lead to different training adaptations.

For instance, after testing the effects of training using the jump-squat or Olympic push—press exercises at the OPL over 6 weeks, Loturco et al 71 concluded that the jump squat was superior for improving speed- and power-related abilities ie, 5-,and m speed, COD speed, loaded and unloaded jumps in elite young soccer players.

Likewise, half- or jump-squat training under optimum loading conditions were able to partly counteract the speed and power decreases that commonly occur during short and congested preseasons in professional soccer players.

Combinations of strength—power exercises executed at the OPL with other training strategies might also be used to induce more generalized performance adaptations. For example, mixed training approaches comprising jump- and half-squat exercises at the OPL and unloaded plyometrics or resisted sprints produced meaningful increases over different phases of sprint running ie, acceleration and top-speed phases in professional soccer players.

Furthermore, the variation within these specific loading zones may be important to elicit progressive adaptation, as constant use of the same loading strategy could adversely affect performance gains across the competitive season. It should be emphasized, however, that the load that maximizes power output changes over time and, thus, coaches are encouraged to frequently assess and adjust the OPL whenever possible and necessary eg, on a weekly basis.

In general, the OPL approach leads to similar or slightly greater strength, speed, and power adaptations compared to more complex traditional resistance training methods, but with lower amounts of total weight lifted and lower levels of neuromuscular fatigue.

Apart from inducing strength, speed, and power adaptations, another common goal of resistance training programs is to enhance body composition ie, promoting muscle mass gains or fat-mass loss.

In this regard, recent evidence has investigated the effects of OPL training on body composition. More recently, different studies by the same research group assessed the effects of OPL training 2 sessions per week and including the hip thrust, squat, and lunge exercises on cyclists.

Thus, although evidence is still scarce and mainly derived from studies in cyclists, OPL training appears as an effective intervention for improving body composition, being at least as effective as other traditional training regimes. Nonetheless, in this case, the study was shorter 6 wkwhich might limit the comparison between the reported results.

Given the potentially detrimental effects of increases in muscle mass and overall BM on endurance performance—particularly during uphill running or cycling—some concerns exist among endurance athletes about including resistance training. Therefore, the current results do not allow us to discern whether OPL training can provide additional benefits in endurance-related outcomes to those induced by endurance training alone.

Overall, bar-power output at the OPL is strongly associated with athletic performance and is able to discriminate between athletes from different sport disciplines and performance levels.

Coaches may implement OPL configurations to induce meaningful PAPE effects via distinct exercises eg, hip thrust or loaded jump squats and protocols eg, cluster- or traditional-set conditions.

Moreover, OPL training strategies can be used to increase strength, speed, and power performance in different athletic populations, with the possible advantage of generating lower levels of neuromuscular fatigue and perceived exertion when compared with more traditional resistance training programs.

Finally, practitioners from different sports may potentially employ OPL-based methods to improve endurance-related outcomes eg, power output attained during a time-trial test and body composition parameters.

It should be acknowledged that there is a lack of long-term interventions based on the OPL, which is, in fact, a common limitation in studies that evaluate the effects of different resistance training strategies in top-level athletes.

We also recognize that the occurrence of an acute mechanical phenomenon ie, maximum power output at a given exercise does not necessarily result in increased training responses—which is not the case here, since we are only synthetizing the evidence concerning OPL studies, while discussing their results and possible implications.

Further studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects of training at the optimum power zone, as well as to compare the physiological and metabolic adaptations of OPL-based programs versus other strength training regimes. The OPL-based schemes can be very useful for coaches and sport scientists interested in implementing simple and effective testing and training approaches.

The OPL method can be effectively used in different sports and populations, with different purposes and configurations Figure 2. COD indicates change of direction; OPL, optimum power load; VJ, vertical jump; MS, maximum strength; BP, bench press; JS, jump squat. Cormie PMcGuigan MRNewton RU.

Developing maximal neuromuscular power: part 2—training considerations for improving maximal power production.

Sports Med. PubMed ID: doi Banyard HGNosaka KSato KHaff GG. Validity of various methods for determining velocity, force, and power in the back squat. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. Pérez-Castilla APiepoli ADelgado-García GGarrido-Blanca GGarcía-Ramos A. Reliability and concurrent validity of seven commercially available devices for the assessment of movement velocity at different intensities during the bench press.

J Strength Cond Res. Pérez-Castilla ABoullosa DGarcía-Ramos A. Sensitivity of the iLOAD ® application for monitoring changes in barbell velocity following power- and strength-oriented resistance training programs.

Blatnik JAGoodman CLCapps CRet al. Effect of load on peak power of the bar, body and system during the deadlift. J Sports Sci Med. PubMed ID: Loturco IPereira LAZanetti VKitamura KAbad CCKobal RNakamura FY. Mechanical differences between barbell and body optimum power loads in the jump squat exercise.

J Hum Kinet. McBride JMHaines TLKirby TJ. Effect of loading on peak power of the bar, body, and system during power cleans, squats, and jump squats. J Sports Sci. Loturco I. Loturco ISuchomel TBishop CKobal RPereira LAMcGuigan M.

One-repetition-maximum measures or maximum bar-power output: which is more related to sport performance? Cormie PMcBride JMMcCaulley GO. The influence of body mass on calculation of power during lower-body resistance exercises. Loturco INakamura FYTricoli Vet al.

Determining the optimum power load in jump squat using the mean propulsive velocity. PLoS One. Ramirez-Campillo RAndrade DCGarcía-Pinillos FNegra YBoullosa DMoran J.

: Optimal power performance

Determining the OPL for Testing and Training Purposes	Prformance Capacity Analysis. Michael R. Eur J Appl Physiol. Indeed, using Holistic approach lighter loads lower avoid inducing excessive fatigue for some and under potentiate for others, with a greater likelihood of optimal individualized PAPE effects. For both athletes, triangles represent the OPL.
Art & Science of Pitching	Powdr aim Protein intake and weight management this brief review is to present and summarize the current Stress reduction workshops regarding the OPL, highlighting the main lines of performanve on this topic performznce discussing the potential applications of this novel approach for testing and training. Eaton's Balancing insulin production Optimal Power Flow Protein intake and weight management module perfofmance for Perrormance system planning studies Pegformance optimize system performance, examine cost-efficient operational planning alternatives, articulate system control strategies and rationalize equipment utilization, resulting in better overall system asset management. Strength training for middle- and long-distance performance: a meta-analysis. horizontal-oriented drop jump training: chronic effects on explosive performances of elite handball players. Soriano MAJiménez-Reyes PRhea MRMarín PJ. The OPL can be easily and precisely determined using any device capable of measuring bar-velocity and automatically calculating bar-power. Valenzuela is with the Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, and the Dept of Sport and Health, Spanish Agency for Health Protection in Sport AEPSADMadrid, Spain.
Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Systems and Control	Across 7 weeks, the progressive VBT group trained at velocity ranges of 0. Overall, both training programs were equally effective for improving strength and power parameters, although a greater increase in deadlift 1RM strength was noticed in the OPL group. The authors observed that the 2 training schemes induced moderate-to-large strength gains in both half-squat and hip-thrust exercises, with distinct but nonmeaningful improvements in COD, linear speed, and jump performances. Different exercises performed at the optimum power zone can potentially lead to different training adaptations. For instance, after testing the effects of training using the jump-squat or Olympic push—press exercises at the OPL over 6 weeks, Loturco et al 71 concluded that the jump squat was superior for improving speed- and power-related abilities ie, 5-, , and m speed, COD speed, loaded and unloaded jumps in elite young soccer players. Likewise, half- or jump-squat training under optimum loading conditions were able to partly counteract the speed and power decreases that commonly occur during short and congested preseasons in professional soccer players. Combinations of strength—power exercises executed at the OPL with other training strategies might also be used to induce more generalized performance adaptations. For example, mixed training approaches comprising jump- and half-squat exercises at the OPL and unloaded plyometrics or resisted sprints produced meaningful increases over different phases of sprint running ie, acceleration and top-speed phases in professional soccer players. Furthermore, the variation within these specific loading zones may be important to elicit progressive adaptation, as constant use of the same loading strategy could adversely affect performance gains across the competitive season. It should be emphasized, however, that the load that maximizes power output changes over time and, thus, coaches are encouraged to frequently assess and adjust the OPL whenever possible and necessary eg, on a weekly basis. In general, the OPL approach leads to similar or slightly greater strength, speed, and power adaptations compared to more complex traditional resistance training methods, but with lower amounts of total weight lifted and lower levels of neuromuscular fatigue. Apart from inducing strength, speed, and power adaptations, another common goal of resistance training programs is to enhance body composition ie, promoting muscle mass gains or fat-mass loss. In this regard, recent evidence has investigated the effects of OPL training on body composition. More recently, different studies by the same research group assessed the effects of OPL training 2 sessions per week and including the hip thrust, squat, and lunge exercises on cyclists. Thus, although evidence is still scarce and mainly derived from studies in cyclists, OPL training appears as an effective intervention for improving body composition, being at least as effective as other traditional training regimes. Nonetheless, in this case, the study was shorter 6 wk , which might limit the comparison between the reported results. Given the potentially detrimental effects of increases in muscle mass and overall BM on endurance performance—particularly during uphill running or cycling—some concerns exist among endurance athletes about including resistance training. Therefore, the current results do not allow us to discern whether OPL training can provide additional benefits in endurance-related outcomes to those induced by endurance training alone. Overall, bar-power output at the OPL is strongly associated with athletic performance and is able to discriminate between athletes from different sport disciplines and performance levels. Coaches may implement OPL configurations to induce meaningful PAPE effects via distinct exercises eg, hip thrust or loaded jump squats and protocols eg, cluster- or traditional-set conditions. Moreover, OPL training strategies can be used to increase strength, speed, and power performance in different athletic populations, with the possible advantage of generating lower levels of neuromuscular fatigue and perceived exertion when compared with more traditional resistance training programs. Finally, practitioners from different sports may potentially employ OPL-based methods to improve endurance-related outcomes eg, power output attained during a time-trial test and body composition parameters. It should be acknowledged that there is a lack of long-term interventions based on the OPL, which is, in fact, a common limitation in studies that evaluate the effects of different resistance training strategies in top-level athletes. We also recognize that the occurrence of an acute mechanical phenomenon ie, maximum power output at a given exercise does not necessarily result in increased training responses—which is not the case here, since we are only synthetizing the evidence concerning OPL studies, while discussing their results and possible implications. Further studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects of training at the optimum power zone, as well as to compare the physiological and metabolic adaptations of OPL-based programs versus other strength training regimes. The OPL-based schemes can be very useful for coaches and sport scientists interested in implementing simple and effective testing and training approaches. The OPL method can be effectively used in different sports and populations, with different purposes and configurations Figure 2. COD indicates change of direction; OPL, optimum power load; VJ, vertical jump; MS, maximum strength; BP, bench press; JS, jump squat. Cormie P , McGuigan MR , Newton RU. Developing maximal neuromuscular power: part 2—training considerations for improving maximal power production. Sports Med. PubMed ID: doi Banyard HG , Nosaka K , Sato K , Haff GG. Validity of various methods for determining velocity, force, and power in the back squat. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. Pérez-Castilla A , Piepoli A , Delgado-García G , Garrido-Blanca G , García-Ramos A. Reliability and concurrent validity of seven commercially available devices for the assessment of movement velocity at different intensities during the bench press. J Strength Cond Res. Pérez-Castilla A , Boullosa D , García-Ramos A. Sensitivity of the iLOAD ® application for monitoring changes in barbell velocity following power- and strength-oriented resistance training programs. Blatnik JA , Goodman CL , Capps CR , et al. Effect of load on peak power of the bar, body and system during the deadlift. J Sports Sci Med. PubMed ID: Loturco I , Pereira LA , Zanetti V , Kitamura K , Abad CC , Kobal R , Nakamura FY. Mechanical differences between barbell and body optimum power loads in the jump squat exercise. J Hum Kinet. McBride JM , Haines TL , Kirby TJ. Effect of loading on peak power of the bar, body, and system during power cleans, squats, and jump squats. J Sports Sci. Loturco I. Loturco I , Suchomel T , Bishop C , Kobal R , Pereira LA , McGuigan M. One-repetition-maximum measures or maximum bar-power output: which is more related to sport performance? Cormie P , McBride JM , McCaulley GO. The influence of body mass on calculation of power during lower-body resistance exercises. Loturco I , Nakamura FY , Tricoli V , et al. Determining the optimum power load in jump squat using the mean propulsive velocity. PLoS One. Ramirez-Campillo R , Andrade DC , García-Pinillos F , Negra Y , Boullosa D , Moran J. Effects of jump training on physical fitness and athletic performance in endurance runners: a meta-analysis. Loturco I , Pereira LA , Abad CC , et al. Bar velocities capable of optimising the muscle power in strength-power exercises. Loturco I , Suchomel T , Bishop C , Kobal R , Pereira LA , McGuigan MR. Determining the optimum bar velocity in the barbell hip thrust exercise. Dello Iacono A , Martone D , Hayes L. Acute mechanical, physiological and perceptual responses in older men to traditional-set or different cluster-set configuration resistance training protocols. Eur J Appl Physiol. Dello Iacono A , Seitz LB. Hip thrust-based PAP effects on sprint performance of soccer players: heavy-loaded versus optimum-power development protocols. Gil S , Barroso R , Crivoi do Carmo E , et al. Effects of resisted sprint training on sprinting ability and change of direction speed in professional soccer players. Gil-Cabrera J , Valenzuela PL , Alejo LB , et al. Traditional versus optimum power load training in professional cyclists: a randomized controlled trial. Loturco I , Suchomel T , James LP , et al. Selective influences of maximum dynamic strength and bar-power output on team sports performance: a comprehensive study of four different disciplines. Front Physiol. Rauch JT , Loturco I , Cheesman N , et al. Similar strength and power adaptations between two different velocity-based training regimens in collegiate female volleyball players. Ribeiro J , Teixeira L , Lemos R , et al. Effects of plyometric versus optimum power load training on components of physical fitness in young male soccer players. Watson K , Halperin I , Aguilera-Castells J , Dello Iacono A. A comparison between predetermined and self-selected approaches in resistance training: effects on power performance and psychological outcomes among elite youth athletes. Lazarus A , Halperin I , Vaknin GJ , Dello Iacono A. Perception of changes in bar velocity as a resistance training monitoring tool for athletes. Physiol Behav. Dello Iacono A , Beato M , Halperin I. Self-selecting the number of repetitions in potentiation protocols: enhancement effects on jumping performance. Loturco I , McGuigan MR , Reis VP , et al. Relationship between power output and speed-related performance in Brazilian wheelchair basketball players. Adapt Phys Activ Q. Loturco I , Nakamura FY , Kobal R , et al. Traditional periodization versus optimum training load applied to soccer players: effects on neuromuscular abilities. Int J Sports Med. Loturco I , McGuigan M , Freitas TT , Valenzuela PL , Pereira LA , Pareja-Blanco F. Performance and reference data in the jump squat at different relative loads in elite sprinters, rugby players, and soccer players. Biol Sport. Valenzuela PL , McGuigan M , Sánchez-Martínez G , et al. Reference power values for the jump squat exercise in elite athletes: a multicenter study. Dello Iacono A , Padulo J , Bešlija T , Halperin I. Barbell hip-thrust exercise: test-retest reliability and correlation with isokinetic performance. Loturco I , Kobal R , Kitamura K , et al. Predictive factors of elite sprint performance: influences of muscle mechanical properties and functional parameters. Loturco I , Kobal R , Maldonado T , et al. Jump squat is more related to sprinting and jumping abilities than Olympic push press. Loturco I , Artioli GG , Kobal R , Gil S , Franchini E. Predicting punching acceleration from selected strength and power variables in elite karate athletes: a multiple regression analysis. Loturco I , Nakamura FY , Artioli GG , et al. Strength and power qualities are highly associated with punching impact in elite amateur boxers. Loturco I , Barbosa AC , Nocentini RK , et al. A correlational analysis of tethered swimming, swim sprint performance and dry-land power assessments. Stokes KA , Jones B , Bennett M , et al. Returning to play after prolonged training restrictions in professional collision sports. Loturco I , Nakamura FY , Winckler C , et al. Strength-power performance of visually impaired Paralympic and Olympic judo athletes from the Brazilian national team: a comparative study. Loturco I , Bishop C , Ramirez-Campillo R , et al. The program begins with a thorough head to toe assessment of each participant. The Physical Therapist will examine your strength, flexibility, proprioception body's awareness of where it is in space , and balance systems with special attention being paid to the areas that are most important to your sport. Based on the results of your assessment, a customized program will be developed for your individual sport performance needs. During each one hour session, your Physical Therapist will guide you through your individualized program to maximize your physical capabilities in order to elevate your sports performance. Specifically, the "optimum power load" OPL is derived from the load-velocity relationship, using only bar force and bar velocity in the power computation. The OPL is easily assessed using a simple incremental testing protocol, based on relative percentages of body mass. To date, several studies have examined the associations between the OPL and different sport-specific measures, as well as its acute and chronic effects on athletic performance.